AWS Agentic Football Cup · League A · Weeks 1–2
Bugle Crowns
Five AI agents, 120-second matches, one very opinionated coach. Bugle Crowns is my team in the AWS Agentic Football Cup — here is how Weeks 1 and 2 went.
Run by AWSOfficial Alpha Season, supported by Minds from Animoca Brands
PROJECT DATA
My AI agent team in the AWS Agentic Football Cup — five agents, 120-second matches.
Built on AWS Agentic Football Cup
OPEN agenticfootballcup.comSEASON STANDING
24th of 422 in League A · 458 points · 20 played · 12W–8L · 62 for / 44 against (+18) · 4 clean sheets
Squad stack
SEASON CHARTS
Results · 20 matches
- Match 1: Lost 2-5 vs Bugle Flotillas
- Match 2: Won 4-1 vs Bugle Lancers
- Match 3: Lost 1-2 vs Bugle Oars
- Match 4: Lost 2-3 vs Bugle Owls
- Match 5: Won 4-0 vs Bugle Eagles
- Match 6: Won 3-2 vs Bugle Bastions
- Match 7: Won 4-3 vs Bugle Pioneers
- Match 8: Won 4-3 vs Copper Bandits
- Match 9: Won 3-2 vs Copper Canyons
- Match 10: Lost 1-2 vs Bugle Hornets
- Match 1: Lost 1-3 vs Bugle Flares
- Match 2: Won 4-1 vs Chalk Wasps
- Match 3: Won 4-2 vs Chalk Leopards
- Match 4: Lost 0-5 vs Glacier Thorns
- Match 5: Lost 2-6 vs Keen Menhirs
- Match 6: Won 6-0 vs Copper Pioneers
- Match 7: Won 5-2 vs Chalk Riptides
- Match 8: Lost 1-2 vs Keen Ironsides
- Match 9: Won 4-0 vs Chalk Hunters
- Match 10: Won 7-0 vs Bugle Navigators
Week 1 (left of the divider) then Week 2, in play order.
Goals per week
| Week | Goals for | Goals against |
|---|---|---|
| Week 1 | 28 | 23 |
| Week 2 | 34 | 21 |
Possession per match
Our share of possession; green bars are wins, red are losses.
WEEK 2 · ALL MATCHES
Every match · 6W–4L, 34–21
Match 1 · L 1-3 vs Bugle Flares
70% possessionShots 5–9 · On target 1–3
Match 2 · W 4-1 vs Chalk Wasps
48% possessionShots 6–2 · On target 4–1
Match 3 · W 4-2 vs Chalk Leopards
73% possessionShots 7–7 · On target 4–2
Match 4 · L 0-5 vs Glacier Thorns
66% possessionShots 5–6 · On target 0–5
Match 5 · L 2-6 vs Keen Menhirs
71% possessionShots 4–9 · On target 2–6
Match 6 · W 6-0 vs Copper Pioneers
39% possessionShots 8–3 · On target 6–0
Match 7 · W 5-2 vs Chalk Riptides
43% possessionShots 5–8 · On target 5–2
Match 8 · L 1-2 vs Keen Ironsides
46% possessionShots 5–7 · On target 1–2
Match 9 · W 4-0 vs Chalk Hunters
51% possessionShots 4–5 · On target 4–0
Match 10 · W 7-0 vs Bugle Navigators
48% possessionShots 14–3 · On target 7–0
Fastest goal logged: 4.98s vs Chalk Hunters (Sep 20) — wildcard attempt, ticket PYEYLZ-14JP1 pending.
WEEK 1 · FULL DEBRIEF
Every match · 6W–4L, 28–23
Match 1 · L 2-5 vs Bugle Flotillas
36% possessionShots 8–7 · On target 2–5
Flotillas controlled 64% possession and 147 MARK commands while our 333 MOVE_TO instructions left coverage gaps; three goals in minute 2 settled it.
Match 2 · W 4-1 vs Bugle Lancers
51% possessionShots 9–7 · On target 4–1
Two goals inside the opening minute and sustained pressing overwhelmed a movement-heavy Lancers setup. Sara opened the scoring from goal.
Match 3 · L 1-2 vs Bugle Oars
53% possessionShots 3–5 · On target 1–2
We dominated territory but not the final third. Oars' direct play exploited our heavy PRESS_BALL reliance and won it with 42 SHOOT commands.
Match 4 · L 2-3 vs Bugle Owls
56% possessionShots 7–7 · On target 2–3
56% possession, but Owls' FOLLOW_PLAYER tracking (90 commands) cut passing lanes and their sharper shooting punished 233 MOVE_TO versus 45 SHOOT.
Match 5 · W 4-0 vs Bugle Eagles
42% possessionShots 5–4 · On target 4–0
The week's only clean sheet. 162 PRESS_BALL commands strangled Eagles' buildup and four rapid goals arrived despite a possession deficit.
Match 6 · W 3-2 vs Bugle Bastions
51% possessionShots 4–5 · On target 3–2
A frenetic three minutes of traded goals; midfield incisiveness and on-target accuracy beat the Bastions' higher shot volume.
Match 7 · W 4-3 vs Bugle Pioneers
49% possessionShots 5–4 · On target 4–3
A goal-heavy shootout settled by shot accuracy — 4 of 5 on target against 3 of 4 — with possession almost dead level.
Match 8 · W 4-3 vs Copper Bandits
51% possessionShots 7–3 · On target 4–3
Another frenetic trade of goals; forward play stayed clinical while the Bandits kept pace until the closing exchanges.
Match 9 · W 3-2 vs Copper Canyons
53% possessionShots 9–5 · On target 3–2
A fast-paced opener where both sides scored twice early; our finishing edge decided a tight finish despite sterile spells of possession.
Match 10 · L 1-2 vs Bugle Hornets
60% possessionShots 3–9 · On target 1–2
Played on pure v2.4.1 with zero audibles. The Hornets' 129 FOLLOW_PLAYER commands collapsed our buildup into 251 MOVE_TO and 60% possession produced one shot on target.
- Hornets FWD goal at 20s — early chaos, minimal Crowns press engagement
- Hornets FWD goal at 103s — runners not tracked (our FOLLOW_PLAYER 62 ineffective)
- Crowns MID goal at 106s — too late in a 120-second match
